![]() ![]() ^ Fariello, Gabriele Jemielniak, Dariusz Sulkowski, Adam (December 7, 2021)."Has Godwin's Law, the Rule of Nazi Comparisons, Been Disproved?". ^ Harrison, Stephen (January 24, 2022).Archived from the original on March 25, 2013. Usenet: ^ Goldacre, Ben (September 16, 2010). "Re: Nazis (was Re: Card's Article on Homosexuality". pp. "Net Culture – Humor" archive section. "Godwin's law of Hitler Analogies (and Corollaries)". ^ a b Godwin, Mike (January 12, 1995). ![]() Toothbrush moustache § Post–World War II.In February of 2023 Microsoft Bing was reported to have compared a journalist to Hitler, thus extending Godwin's Law to large language models. In March 2022, Godwin wrote "you're not going to believe who this guy reminds me of" about Vladimir Putin, actually using his own rule. He rejected the idea that whoever invokes Godwin's law has lost the argument, and argued that, applied appropriately, the rule "should function less as a conversation ender and more as a conversation starter." ![]() In June 2018, Godwin wrote an opinion piece in the Los Angeles Times denying the need to update or amend the rule. In December 2015, Godwin commented on comparisons to Nazism and fascism being made by several articles between Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, saying: "If you're thoughtful about it and show some real awareness of history, go ahead and refer to Hitler when you talk about Trump, or any other politician." In August 2017, Godwin made similar remarks on social media with respect to the two previous days' Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, endorsing and encouraging comparisons of its alt-right organizers to Nazis. Godwin wrote that "Although deliberately framed as if it were a law of nature or of mathematics, its purpose has always been rhetorical and pedagogical: I wanted folks who glibly compared someone else to Hitler to think a bit harder about the Holocaust." Godwin himself has also criticized the overapplication of the law, claiming that it does not articulate a fallacy, but rather is intended to reduce the frequency of inappropriate and hyperbolic comparisons. Godwin's law itself can be applied mistakenly or abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, when fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparison made by the argument is appropriate. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law. For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress. There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself) than others. In 2021, Harvard researchers published an article showing the phenomenon does not occur with statistically meaningful frequency in Reddit discussions. ![]() In 2012, Godwin's law became an entry in the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. Later it was applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs. He stated that he introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics. Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990, Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions. Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of Nazi analogies, is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer (regardless of topic or scope), the probability of a comparison to Nazis or Adolf Hitler approaches 1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |